Control over AI
Decide · In depth

Assess the risks before you allow an AI tool.

Before you allow an AI tool, you need to know what happens to the data, where the vendor is based and what incidents are on record. BeeSensible collects those facts for over 1,000 AI tools and sums them up in a risk score. This page explains how, so you know what the score tells you and what it doesn't.

What we collect

For each tool, the facts you need to decide.

Vendor and ownership

Who makes the tool, the parent company and the country of establishment.

Hosting and jurisdiction

Where data is processed and which law applies there.

Training policy

Whether the tool trains on input, and whether you can opt out.

Data processing agreement

Whether the vendor offers a data processing agreement (DPA). Many free versions don't.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2 and similar, as published by the vendor.

Incidents with a source

Data breaches and lawsuits, with their source.

AI register
DeepSeek

DeepSeek

Decision

Decision

Decision
Priya Nair, 11 February 2026
Reason
Trains on everything that goes in and runs outside the EU. Use Copilot for the same work. Change
Designated alternative
Microsoft 365 Copilot Change

Not in the register yet. Make a decision to add it.

About the tool

From the BeeSensible catalog, not editable here.

RiskCritical · 90/100BeeSensible's estimate, not a legal judgement · reviewed on 18 Sept 2026

Data governance (5): trains on input, no opt-out, no processing agreement. Jurisdiction (5): vendor and hosting in China, under Chinese laws that give the state access to data. Compliance (5): no certification found. Incidents (5): a public database exposure in 2025, with a source. Integration scope (2): web app only. Vendor trust (3): ownership documented, model open.

Vendor

Vendor
DeepSeek
Country
China
Kind of tool
General assistant

Data

Trains on input
Yes
Hosting and region
China
Processing agreement from the vendor
Not available

Regulation

EU AI Act
Limited risk
Certifications
Unknown

The classification is about the tool itself; which obligations apply depends on your use.

AI register
ChatGPT

OpenAI

Decision

Decision

Decision
Lucía Ortega, 8 September 2025
Use cases
Analysis & knowledge, Summarizing, Writing communication, CV screening Change1 use case can fall under the EU AI Act
Reason
Widely used; the business account runs through the company subscription. No client files, no personal data of clients. Change
State
In use at your organisationNo longer in use: the registration is kept with an end date and the decision stays as it is.
No longer in use

Responsible

  • Lucía OrtegaOwner
  • Daniel WhitfieldIT
  • Ingrid HansenPrivacy
Change

Documents

  • Processing agreementIn place · 14 Mar 2026 · Open ↗Processing agreement from the vendor: Available
    Change
  • DPIACarried out · 14 Jun 2026 · Open ↗Personal data in 3 of 4 use cases
    Change
  • AI policy 2026Usage rules or AI policyIn place · 20 Jan 2026 · Open ↗
    Change
  • Internal assessmentCarried out · 1 Sept 2025
    Change
+ Add document

Reassessment

Last reassessment
8 Sept 2026
Next reassessment
8 Sept 2027
Reassessment owner
Lucía Ortega
Start reassessmentChange date or person

About the tool

From the BeeSensible catalog, not editable here.

RiskHigh · 62/100BeeSensible's estimate, not a legal judgement · reviewed on 2 Oct 2026

Data governance (4): the consumer version trains on input unless the user opts out; a processing agreement is available for the business tiers. Jurisdiction (3): vendor in the US, hosting in the US. Compliance (3): SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 according to the vendor; EU AI Act transparency duties apply to a general-purpose assistant. Incidents (3): documented incidents with a source, including shared conversations indexed by search engines. Integration scope (3) and vendor trust (1) follow from what the product does and who supplies it.

Vendor

Vendor
OpenAI
Country
United States
Kind of tool
General assistant

Data

Trains on input
Opt-out
Hosting and region
United States
Processing agreement from the vendor
Available

Regulation

EU AI Act
Limited risk
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

The classification is about the tool itself; which obligations apply depends on your use.

⤓ Download pdf

The facts about DeepSeek and ChatGPT, as they appear in each tool's record. Demonstration.

Risk assessment

How a tool gets its score.

Every tool in the catalogue is scored on six dimensions, each from 1 to 5, where a higher score means more risk. The dimensions are not weighted equally: what the vendor does with your data counts most.

Data governance

Weight 6

How the vendor handles your data: whether it trains on your input, whether it offers a DPA and where the data is stored.

Jurisdiction

Weight 4

Legal risk based on where the vendor and its data are located. Countries that allow state access or lack a GDPR adequacy decision score higher.

Compliance

Weight 3

Alignment with GDPR and the EU AI Act, plus recognised certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2.

Incidents

Weight 3

The tool's history of breaches, leaks or misuse. More documented incidents, or more serious ones, mean a higher score.

Integration scope

Weight 2

How much access the tool asks for: from a standalone chat window to connectors and actions inside your own systems.

Vendor trust

Weight 2

How open the vendor is about ownership and the underlying model, plus the company's track record and maturity.

From score to risk band

Low below 40 Medium 40 to 59 High 60 to 79 Critical 80 and above

DeepSeek

Critical 90/100

DeepSeek · China

Why this assessment

  • · Trains on your input by default.
  • · Vendor jurisdiction (CN) allows state access; no GDPR adequacy.
  • · No data-processing agreement (DPA) available.

Incidents, with a source

  • 2025 · Public share links indexed by search engines source
  • 2025 · Regulator blocked the app over data transfers to China source

If a tool has a history, it's listed with a link to the source. If there's no verified source, the product says so explicitly. That keeps it a fact, not a rumour.

Variants

Free and business versions are separate tools.

The free version of ChatGPT and ChatGPT for business differ in training policy, contract and DPA. That's why the catalogue lists them separately, each with its own score and its own decision. Lookalikes and wrappers that borrow a well-known name are recognised for what they are.

The EU AI Act

An indicative classification, not a legal judgement.

Every tool carries an indicative EU AI Act classification: high, limited or minimal risk. For some tools it depends on the use, and some can't be classified. The classification is about the tool as it's offered. Whether your use falls into a high-risk category depends on what you use it for; that is for your organisation to assess, and you record it in the register.

What the score is not

The score informs; the decision is yours.

Not a decision

A high score doesn't automatically make a tool Not allowed. Every tool starts at "no decision yet", and there's no default policy per risk band.

Not a judgement on your use

The score is about the tool. A tool with a low score can still be unsuitable for your use case, and vice versa.

Not a guarantee

We base the assessment on what vendors publish and what verified sources say. Anything we don't know is shown as unknown, not as safe.

Not static

The catalogue is kept up to date continuously. A tool that isn't in it yet can still be given a decision.

Back to Decide

Assess your own tools with these facts.

Roll out BeeSensible and within a day you'll see which tools are in use, with the catalogue facts alongside.

Start free trial

14 days free, no credit card. Rolled out across your organisation within an hour.

Portrait of Rens Timmermans from BeeSensible

Prefer someone to walk you through it?

Rens, BeeSensible

I'm happy to give you a twenty-minute tour. Leave your details and I'll find a time that suits you. You're also welcome to call or email.

Prefer to talk to someone first?

Want a live demo, or a quote for 100+ users? Leave your details and we'll be in touch within one working day.