Control over AI
Substantiate

Show how your AI policy works in practice.

An auditor, your DPO or the board wants to know how your AI policy is working in practice. With Accountability you create a monthly or quarterly report on three questions: do we know which AI tools are in use, is sensitive data protected, and does the policy reach people?

Prefer to try it yourself? 14 days free, no credit card.

Accountability

AI use, decisions and sensitive data, for accountability and audits.

Q3 2026Create report

1 July to 30 September 2026

Visibility of AI use

GDPR art. 5(1)(c) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(a) · AI Act art. 4(1)

11
AI tools observed
7
Tools with a decision
7 of 11 observed tools

Which AI tools staff visited, and for how many of them a decision is recorded.

Explanation

Protection of sensitive data

GDPR art. 5(1)(c) and 32(1) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(d)

3,202
Critical detections
86%
Adjusted
2,754 of 3,202 masked or removed

How often BeeSensible flagged critical data, and how often it was then masked or removed.

Only in the apps where BeeSensible helps; what happens elsewhere is not included.

Explanation

Supporting staff

NIS2 art. 21(2)(g) · AI Act art. 4(1)

148
AI notices shown
37%
Alternative opened
after 55 of 148 notices

How often an AI notice appeared, and how often the suggested alternative was opened after it.

These figures do not show whether staff are sufficiently trained.

Explanation

Decisions as they stood on 30 September 2026, at the end of the period.

Measurement coverage

How large the part is that BeeSensible measures.

  • BeeSensible is activated on 93% of the seats

    112 of 120 seats in the subscription. Activated means the extension or the desktop app reported in at least once; it does not mean every account is protected at all times.

  • 78% of AI use was in apps where BeeSensible helps (estimate)

    › How is this calculated?

Relevant laws and regulations

GDPR art. 5(1)(c) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(a) · AI Act art. 4(1) · GDPR art. 5(1)(c) and 32(1) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(d) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(g) · AI Act art. 4(1)

Show provisions ⌄

The Accountability screen. Demonstration with a fictional organisation.

The report

A report per period, for meetings and audits.

In an audit of last quarter, you want to show the figures and decisions as they were then, not as they are now.

You create a report for a month or quarter with the figures and their scope, the measurement coverage, the explanation for each legal provision and the decisions as they stood at the end of the period. After that, the report doesn't change, and you can download it as a PDF.

You have a document that shows how things stood in that period, and you can compare it with the previous one.

Accountability

AI use, decisions and sensitive data, for accountability and audits.

Q3 2026Create report

1 July to 30 September 2026

Visibility of AI use

GDPR art. 5(1)(c) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(a) · AI Act art. 4(1)

11
AI tools observed
7
Tools with a decision
7 of 11 observed tools

Which AI tools staff visited, and for how many of them a decision is recorded.

Explanation

Protection of sensitive data

GDPR art. 5(1)(c) and 32(1) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(d)

3,202
Critical detections
86%
Adjusted
2,754 of 3,202 masked or removed

How often BeeSensible flagged critical data, and how often it was then masked or removed.

Only in the apps where BeeSensible helps; what happens elsewhere is not included.

Explanation

Supporting staff

NIS2 art. 21(2)(g) · AI Act art. 4(1)

148
AI notices shown
37%
Alternative opened
after 55 of 148 notices

How often an AI notice appeared, and how often the suggested alternative was opened after it.

These figures do not show whether staff are sufficiently trained.

Explanation

Decisions as they stood on 30 September 2026, at the end of the period.

Measurement coverage

How large the part is that BeeSensible measures.

  • BeeSensible is activated on 93% of the seats

    112 of 120 seats in the subscription. Activated means the extension or the desktop app reported in at least once; it does not mean every account is protected at all times.

  • 78% of AI use was in apps where BeeSensible helps (estimate)

    › How is this calculated?

Relevant laws and regulations

GDPR art. 5(1)(c) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(a) · AI Act art. 4(1) · GDPR art. 5(1)(c) and 32(1) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(d) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(g) · AI Act art. 4(1)

Show provisions ⌄

Reports

Q2 20261 April to 30 June 2026compiled on 3 Jul 2026 by Lucía OrtegaChecksum 9f3c2a7e
Q1 20261 January to 31 March 2026compiled on 2 Apr 2026 by Lucía OrtegaChecksum 4b81d0c5

Accountability, with reports for earlier periods. Demonstration with fictional data.

Three questions

Three questions the report answers.

In a meeting or an audit, you want to show how the AI policy has worked over a period, not just at a single moment.

Each question gets two figures for the chosen period, with their scope. If there's no data for a figure, it says No measurement data instead of zero.

You can show what you know, and what the figures cover.

Visibility of AI use

Which AI tools were visited, and how many of them have a decision.

The two figures

AI tools observedTools with a decision

Not covered

Under review doesn't count as a decision.

Protection of sensitive data

How often critical data was highlighted, and how often it was then masked or removed.

The two figures

Critical detectionsAdjusted

Not covered

Only in the apps where BeeSensible helps.

Supporting staff

How often an AI notice appeared, and how often the alternative was opened afterwards.

The two figures

AI notices shownAlternative opened

Not covered

These figures don't show whether staff are sufficiently trained.

The day-to-day figures are under See, in Compliance and Sensitive data

Mapped to the law

For each provision: what the law asks, what BeeSensible contributes and what it does not cover.

A DPO wants to know which obligation a figure relates to. A CISO wants to know what it doesn't cover.

For each topic you can open an explanation of every provision, with its exact wording and the official source: GDPR Article 5(1)(c) and Article 32(1), NIS2 Article 21(2) (in the Netherlands, the Dutch Cybersecurity Act or Cyberbeveiligingswet) and AI Act Article 4(1).

You can link a figure to an obligation without pretending the figure ticks it off. This isn't legal advice, and there's no status per article.

GDPR Article 5(1)(c)

What the law asks
Data minimisation.
What BeeSensible contributes
Critical detections and the share adjusted before sending.
Not covered
Whether the processing as a whole is necessary, and what happens outside the supported apps.

GDPR Article 32(1)

What the law asks
Appropriate technical and organisational security.
What BeeSensible contributes
A measure at the point of input, with figures on what it did.
Not covered
The rest of your security, and whether it is appropriate as a whole.

NIS2 Article 21(2)(a), (d) and (g)

What the law asks
Risk analysis, supply chain, cyber hygiene and training.
What BeeSensible contributes
Which AI services are in use and how many have a decision; how often the policy was shown and followed.
Not covered
Whether the law applies to you, the wider measures and the reporting obligation.

AI Act Article 4(1)

What the law asks
A sufficient level of AI literacy among staff.
What BeeSensible contributes
That the policy reaches people when they open an AI tool.
Not covered
Whether employees are sufficiently trained.
What it doesn't do

Accountability doesn't establish compliance, and never shows individuals.

No certification

BeeSensible helps you comply with privacy rules. It doesn't certify anything or guarantee compliance. There are no compliance statuses, and no percentages presented as a legal standard.

Never per person

All figures are totals for the whole organisation. Figures only appear once five or more users are active; below that, there are no figures and no report.

Switched on per organisation

Accountability is switched on for each organisation separately. It requires the Realtime Privacy and AI Governance modules.

Then back to the start: See

Back up your AI policy with figures over a period.

Start with See, then switch on Accountability once the first figures are in. Want to see a report first? Book a demo.

Start free trial

14 days free, no credit card. Rolled out across your organisation within an hour.

Portrait of Rens Timmermans from BeeSensible

Prefer someone to walk you through it?

Rens, BeeSensible

I'm happy to give you a twenty-minute tour. Leave your details and I'll find a time that suits you. You're also welcome to call or email.

Prefer to talk to someone first?

Want a live demo, or a quote for 100+ users? Leave your details and we'll be in touch within one working day.