Control over AI

For DPOs, privacy officers and compliance

See everyday AI use, and the personal data that goes into it.

See which AI tools colleagues use and record the decision and documents for each one. Colleagues get help as soon as personal data appears in their text.

Prefer to try it yourself? 14 days free, no credit card.

Personal data is already going into AI tools. Your record of processing doesn't show it yet.

Colleagues use AI to summarise reports, rewrite customer emails and sort data subject requests. Names, ID numbers and health details go in with them, often to tools that are not in the record of processing activities or have no data processing agreement (DPA). As a DPO you want to know before something goes wrong, and be able to show what is in place. Here's how, in four steps.

1 See

See which AI tools colleagues use.

You want to know whether personal data ends up in AI tools. That starts with knowing which tools colleagues actually open. The catalogue shows the tools seen in the organisation, from Copilot and ChatGPT to Otter.ai and DeepSeek, each with a risk score and the organisation's decision. Usage and Compliance show what share of AI use goes through approved tools, and which tools are in use without a decision.

More about See

All tools

Every known AI tool, filterable by risk and properties.

Add your own tool
AllAllowedLimited useNo decision yet7Not allowed
Search by tool, vendor, domain or former name…
FiltersOnly in use9 tools
ToolSectorCountryVisitsRiskDecision
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
GeneralChina96Critical · 90/100Not allowed
Otter.aiNew
Otter.ai
ProductivityUnited States130High · 68/100No decision yet
Grok
xAI
GeneralUnited States41High · 67/100Not allowed
ChatGPT
OpenAI
GeneralUnited States1,842High · 62/100Allowed
Gamma
Gamma
MarketingUnited States214Medium · 50/100No decision yet
Canva Magic Studio
Canva
CreativeAustralia312Medium · 47/100Limited use
Claude
Anthropic
GeneralUnited States926Low · 39/100Limited use
Mistral Le ChatNew
Mistral AI
GeneralFrance28Low · 30/100No decision yet
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Microsoft
GeneralUnited States8,124Low · 28/100Allowed

An impression of the AI tools catalogue. The tools and risk scores come from the product. The decision in the last column is your organisation's own.

2 Decide

Record what is allowed for each tool, and what is in place.

ChatGPT turns out to be used every day for meeting notes and customer emails. You want to be sure a DPA is in place and that the DPIA covers that use. The screen shows the ChatGPT register entry: the decision and who made it, whether each use case involves personal data, the DPA and the DPIA with their dates, and the next review. So for every tool you see which documents are in place and which are still missing. The catalogue supplies the vendor facts; the decision stays yours.

More about Decide
AI register
ChatGPT

OpenAI

Decision

Decision

Decision
Lucía Ortega, 8 September 2025
Use cases
Analysis & knowledge, Summarizing, Writing communication, CV screening Change1 use case can fall under the EU AI Act
Reason
Widely used; the business account runs through the company subscription. No client files, no personal data of clients. Change
State
In use at your organisationNo longer in use: the registration is kept with an end date and the decision stays as it is.
No longer in use

Responsible

  • Lucía OrtegaOwner
  • Daniel WhitfieldIT
  • Ingrid HansenPrivacy
Change

Documents

  • Processing agreementIn place · 14 Mar 2026 · Open ↗Processing agreement from the vendor: Available
    Change
  • DPIACarried out · 14 Jun 2026 · Open ↗Personal data in 3 of 4 use cases
    Change
  • AI policy 2026Usage rules or AI policyIn place · 20 Jan 2026 · Open ↗
    Change
  • Internal assessmentCarried out · 1 Sept 2025
    Change
+ Add document

Reassessment

Last reassessment
8 Sept 2026
Next reassessment
8 Sept 2027
Reassessment owner
Lucía Ortega
Start reassessmentChange date or person

About the tool

From the BeeSensible catalog, not editable here.

RiskHigh · 62/100BeeSensible's estimate, not a legal judgement · reviewed on 2 Oct 2026

Data governance (4): the consumer version trains on input unless the user opts out; a processing agreement is available for the business tiers. Jurisdiction (3): vendor in the US, hosting in the US. Compliance (3): SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 according to the vendor; EU AI Act transparency duties apply to a general-purpose assistant. Incidents (3): documented incidents with a source, including shared conversations indexed by search engines. Integration scope (3) and vendor trust (1) follow from what the product does and who supplies it.

Vendor

Vendor
OpenAI
Country
United States
Kind of tool
General assistant

Data

Trains on input
Opt-out
Hosting and region
United States
Processing agreement from the vendor
Available

Regulation

EU AI Act
Limited risk
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

The classification is about the tool itself; which obligations apply depends on your use.

⤓ Download pdf

Product example with fictional data.

3 Help

Help colleagues protect personal data while they work.

A colleague asks an AI tool to summarise an access request for tomorrow's meeting. The text holds the requester's name, his social security number and a health detail. BeeSensible highlights all three in the text. One click turns them into a placeholder such as [NAME1], or removes them, and the summary is just as useful. The organisation can also set masking to happen automatically when text is pasted or sent. The logged request can be anonymised the same way before it is shared.

More about Help
Gemini
Can you summarise this access request for tomorrow's meeting?
Sure. Do check the personal details before you share this outside the file.
BeeSensible puts its highlights right in the text.

Product example with fictional data.

4 Substantiate

Back up your register, your DPIA and your annual report.

You are updating the record of processing activities, revisiting a DPIA or writing the annual report to the board. You want to show that the measure works. Each month or quarter you create a report: how many tools have a decision, how many critical details were adjusted before sending, and how often colleagues chose the approved alternative after a notice. Always for the whole organisation, never per person, and downloadable as a PDF.

More about Substantiate
Accountability

AI use, decisions and sensitive data, for accountability and audits.

Q3 2026Create report

1 July to 30 September 2026

Visibility of AI use

GDPR art. 5(1)(c) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(a) · AI Act art. 4(1)

11
AI tools observed
7
Tools with a decision
7 of 11 observed tools

Which AI tools staff visited, and for how many of them a decision is recorded.

Explanation

Protection of sensitive data

GDPR art. 5(1)(c) and 32(1) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(d)

3,202
Critical detections
86%
Adjusted
2,754 of 3,202 masked or removed

How often BeeSensible flagged critical data, and how often it was then masked or removed.

Only in the apps where BeeSensible helps; what happens elsewhere is not included.

Explanation

Supporting staff

NIS2 art. 21(2)(g) · AI Act art. 4(1)

148
AI notices shown
37%
Alternative opened
after 55 of 148 notices

How often an AI notice appeared, and how often the suggested alternative was opened after it.

These figures do not show whether staff are sufficiently trained.

Explanation

Decisions as they stood on 30 September 2026, at the end of the period.

Measurement coverage

How large the part is that BeeSensible measures.

  • BeeSensible is activated on 93% of the seats

    112 of 120 seats in the subscription. Activated means the extension or the desktop app reported in at least once; it does not mean every account is protected at all times.

  • 78% of AI use was in apps where BeeSensible helps (estimate)

    › How is this calculated?

Relevant laws and regulations

GDPR art. 5(1)(c) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(a) · AI Act art. 4(1) · GDPR art. 5(1)(c) and 32(1) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(d) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(g) · AI Act art. 4(1)

Show provisions ⌄

Product example with fictional data.

A customer's view

"Everyone here knows you have to be careful with customer data. But that awareness fades when you're busy. Knowledge is no guarantee of behaviour. That's exactly why we use BeeSensible."
Portrait of Debby Elfrink, operations director at Speck Pompen Debby Elfrink Operations director, Speck Pompen

This customer works in a different sector.

Trust and getting started

Your data stays safe, and getting started is quick.

What happens to your data

  • Text is checked on our own servers, hosted by the European companies Scaleway and Hetzner, and deleted straight away.
  • The dashboard shows totals for the whole organisation, never a breakdown by employee. Figures only appear once five or more users are active.
  • You get a data processing agreement (DPA). The product DPIA and security information are available on request.
Go to the Trust Center

How to get started

  • Install the extension on a few workstations, or have IT roll it out centrally through Intune or Group Policy, on any plan.
  • Employees get an explanation and short videos about what they'll see and what they can do.
Quick start for admins

Good to know

Questions we often get.

What exactly does BeeSensible process and keep?

Typed text is checked in the working memory of our own servers at Scaleway in Amsterdam and Hetzner in Germany, then discarded straight away. What remains is an event without a user ID: the type of data, the level, the app, the time and what was done with it, plus a check value that merges repeats within the same hour. We keep those events for at most 24 months.

Can I reconstruct a data breach with BeeSensible?

No, that is not what it is built for. Content is not kept and there is no user ID. The dashboard shows counts, only once five or more users are active, and has no per-employee view. Over a period you see which kinds of data came up in which apps and what was done with them. That helps your risk assessment, not the investigation of one specific case.

Which personal data does BeeSensible recognise?

65 data types in 11 categories, in English and Dutch: from names, addresses and national ID numbers to health data, financial details and technical keys. In each detection profile you decide which types are included and which count as critical. File codes and project names the detection does not know can be added as custom terms.

How does this fit the GDPR and the AI Act?

You are the controller, BeeSensible is the processor. A DPA comes with every contract; the product DPIA and the list of subprocessors are available on request. The AI register feeds into your record of processing activities and your own DPIA. The legal basis, the risk assessment and the judgement of what is appropriate are yours to record.

Does BeeSensible block AI tools?

Not on its own. People see what was found and what you decided about a tool. You decide whether someone can still go ahead with a tool that is not allowed, and whether masking happens by default. What happens after a highlight or a notice is counted, without content and without a name.

Read more about a DPIA for workplace AI

Start by seeing which AI tools your organisation uses

Start with a few colleagues, or see it in a demo first.

Start free trial

14 days free, no credit card. Rolled out across your organisation within an hour.

Portrait of Rens Timmermans from BeeSensible

Prefer someone to walk you through it?

Rens, BeeSensible

I'm happy to give you a twenty-minute tour. Leave your details and I'll find a time that suits you. You're also welcome to call or email.

Prefer to talk to someone first?

Want a live demo, or a quote for 100+ users? Leave your details and we'll be in touch within one working day.