Lawyers use AI to draft contracts, summarise email, and speed up research. BeeSensible highlights client names, case numbers, and confidential details in the text you write, before a prompt or email leaves the firm.
Who this is for
20+
AI tools, email, and chat where the extension watches along
0 sec.
The text you type is processed and discarded at once
EU
Detection and storage stay inside the European Union
A draft contract, the summary of a case file, a memo for the client: exactly the texts where AI saves time. And exactly the texts with names, case numbers, and confidential terms in them. BeeSensible highlights that data while you type, so you can remove it before you send.
From the field
A lawyer pastes a clause into ChatGPT and asks for sharper wording. That clause holds the counterparty's name, the deal value, and a confidential term. The text reads better, but the details of a live deal have now been processed by an outside tool.
A paralegal asks AI to summarise a long email thread for the file. The client name, the case number, and the opposing party's name all go into the prompt. The summary is ready at once, and information covered by confidentiality has left the firm.
After an incident, the regulator wants to know which confidential data ended up in which AI tools. A policy on responsible AI use exists. Proof that staff got a warning at the moment itself does not.
Guidance while people write
Legal staff can clean up the text before privileged details are shared.
Why this is hard
Lawyers use ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini to draft, review, and summarise. Often without calling it AI. Policy lags behind what happens every day.
Pasting client names, case numbers, or deal terms into a consumer AI tool can touch your duty of confidentiality, even when it happens by accident and the output was useful.
Banning AI outright gives you no safety, only Shadow AI on personal laptops. People need help at the moment they type, not a rule they route around.
To clients, to the regulator, to your own partners. The team expected to set the example cannot rely on a policy on paper. You show that the control actually works.
Across education
The same risk shows up in different files, from primary school to research.
Contracts
Drafts and clauses with party names, amounts, and confidential terms.
Disputes
Case files, correspondence, and pleadings with client and counterparty data.
M&A and deals
Due diligence, term sheets, and bids full of confidential deal details.
Privacy and compliance
Regulatory submissions and reports with personal data about individuals.
Internal legal
Advice, memos, and minutes where names and sensitive context recur.
How BeeSensible helps
Sensitive details get a highlight while staff write. They decide what to remove, replace, or mask.
Highlights client names, case numbers, party names, account numbers, and confidential amounts while you type.
Runs in the browser, in AI tools, email, and documents. No separate app, no proxy, no training up front.
You choose: remove, replace with a realistic alternative, or mask. The extension never changes your text on its own and never blocks sending.
Administrators see patterns by tool and category. What an individual lawyer writes is never stored and cannot be read.
For partners, DPO, and compliance officer
BeeSensible gives you the evidence you need in front of clients and regulators, while respecting the privacy of your own staff.
Total detections
12,438
Top apps
Example dashboard. Counts and types only, never content.
Compliance officer
Show clients, partners, and the regulator that staff get a warning at the moment of input, backed by counts of detections and handled prompts.
Privacy officer
The dashboard shows no text and no single people. Groups smaller than ten users are not shown. Insight into patterns, not surveillance of people.
CISO and IT
No proxy and no new application. The extension runs in Chrome and Edge. Detection and storage stay inside the EU, all traffic over TLS 1.3.
Honest answers
If a tool cannot answer these, it does not belong on your browsers. Here is where BeeSensible stands.
No. The extension analyses text in the input fields of supported tools to highlight sensitive data. That text travels to a BeeSensible server inside the EU, is processed in working memory, and is discarded at once. The content is never stored and cannot be read by anyone, not even an administrator.
No, BeeSensible blocks nothing. You see a highlight in the text and choose what to do: remove, replace, or mask. The lawyer stays in control, and the firm gets insight into patterns.
No tool makes you compliant on its own. BeeSensible helps with GDPR and your duty of confidentiality by covering the moment of input. The firm stays the controller, BeeSensible is the processor, and a processing agreement is signed.
Yes. The detection engine handles Dutch and English reliably and recognises data common in legal work, such as names, case numbers, account numbers, and amounts.
Limited. There is no proxy or new application to install. The extension runs in the browser your firm already uses and can be rolled out centrally through your management console.
Compliance
GDPR
Supports your accountability and covers the moment personal data is entered.
Duty of confidentiality and privilege
Helps recognise client names, case numbers, and confidential details before they are shared.
Processing agreement
A processing agreement is signed with every customer. A product DPIA is available on request.
EU processing
Detection runs on the user's own machine, or on ISO 27001 certified EU infrastructure (API in the Netherlands, detection in Germany).
BeeSensible works in the tools your firm already uses. No rollout project, and you see your first detections in minutes.
Claude