Control over AI
Legal & compliance

Client data does not belong in an AI prompt

Lawyers use AI to draft contracts, summarise email, and speed up research. BeeSensible highlights client names, case numbers, and confidential details in the text you write, before a prompt or email leaves the firm.

  • On-device or EU processing
  • No content stored
  • Fits your duty of confidentiality

Who this is for

  • In-house counsel drafting and reviewing contracts with AI
  • Compliance officers writing regulatory submissions
  • Paralegals summarising case files and correspondence
  • Data protection officers and privacy officers
Legal professional reviewing documents at a laptop

18

apps with a highlight while you type: AI tools, email, chat, and social

0 sec.

The text you type is processed and discarded at once

Local or EU

Detection runs on-device or on EU infrastructure

A draft contract, the summary of a case file, a memo for the client: exactly the texts where AI saves time. And exactly the texts with names, case numbers, and confidential terms in them. BeeSensible highlights that data while you type, so you can remove it before you send.

From the field

Three moments your policy never reaches.

Working a matter

A contract that gives away too much

A lawyer pastes a clause into ChatGPT and asks for sharper wording. That clause holds the counterparty's name, the deal value, and a confidential term. The text reads better, but the details of a live deal have now been processed by an outside tool.

During a dispute

A summary with one name too many

A paralegal asks AI to summarise a long email thread for the file. The client name, the case number, and the opposing party's name all go into the prompt. The summary is ready at once, and information covered by confidentiality has left the firm.

In compliance

The question from the regulator you cannot answer

After an incident, the regulator wants to know which confidential data ended up in which AI tools. A policy on responsible AI use exists. Proof that staff got a warning at the moment itself does not.

01 See and decide

See which AI tools are already used in the firm, and decide per tool what is allowed.

The catalog already covers more than 25 AI tools built for legal work, from contract drafting to case research, each scored on data governance, jurisdiction, and vendor trust. When someone in the firm opens one, you see it appear. Then the firm decides: allow it, allow it with a condition of your own, or not allow it. Anyone opening the tool afterwards sees that decision in the browser, with the approved alternative leading.

25+ legal AI tools already risk-scored in our catalog
Search tool, vendor or category…
700+ tools
ChatGPT🇺🇸
HighAllowed
Claude🇺🇸
MediumAllowed
DeepSeek🇨🇳new
CriticalNot allowed
Perplexity🇺🇸new
MediumNo decision yet
Mistral🇫🇷
LowNo decision yet
Midjourney🇺🇸
MediumNo decision yet
02 Guidance while people write

Client names, case numbers, and counterparty details are marked while legal drafts.

Legal staff can clean up the text before privileged details are shared.

Claude
Turn these notes into a client-safe summary without exposing direct identifiers.
Here is a cleaner summary draft. Review the marked details before sharing with external parties.
Draft an NDA summary for the merger between Northgate Ltd and Alpine Data GmbH. Key party: Hugo Schneider (CFO), BSN 293847561. Transaction value €12.4M. Confidential until 1 September.
Review sensitive details before sharing outside the browser.
03 Clean

Clean a case file before it goes into an AI tool.

A due diligence memo, a case summary, a draft contract: open it in the Mac or Windows desktop app, and client names, case numbers, counterparty names, and deal values are marked for you to remove before you share the document or paste it into AI.

Case file.pdf
Client name
Case number
Counterparty name
Deal value

Why this is hard

The risk sits in the moment someone types.

01

AI is already in every legal team

Lawyers use ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini to draft, review, and summarise. Often without calling it AI. Policy lags behind what happens every day.

02

Confidentiality does not stop at the browser

Pasting client names, case numbers, or deal terms into a consumer AI tool can touch your duty of confidentiality, even when it happens by accident and the output was useful.

03

A ban backfires

Banning AI outright gives you no safety, only Shadow AI on personal laptops. People need help at the moment they type, not a rule they route around.

04

You have to be able to explain it

To clients, to the regulator, to your own partners. The team expected to set the example cannot rely on a policy on paper. You show that the control actually works.

Across legal

Recognisable wherever you work.

The same risk shows up in different files, from contracts to disputes.

Contracts

Drafts and clauses with party names, amounts, and confidential terms.

Disputes

Case files, correspondence, and pleadings with client and counterparty data.

M&A and deals

Due diligence, term sheets, and bids full of confidential deal details.

Privacy and compliance

Regulatory submissions and reports with personal data about individuals.

Internal legal

Advice, memos, and minutes where names and sensitive context recur.

How BeeSensible helps

A warning in the text field, before anything is sent.

Sensitive details get a highlight while staff write. They decide what to remove, replace, or mask.

Recognises legal data

Highlights client names, case numbers, party names, account numbers, and confidential amounts while you type.

Works in the tools you already use

Runs in the browser, in AI tools, email, and chat, plus a desktop app for macOS and Windows for document redaction and on-device detection. No proxy, no training up front.

You stay in control

You choose: remove, replace with a realistic alternative, or mask. The extension never changes your text on its own and never blocks sending.

Counts, not content

Administrators see patterns by tool and category. What an individual lawyer writes is never stored and cannot be read.

For partners, DPO, and compliance officer

Show the control works, without looking over anyone's shoulder

BeeSensible gives you the evidence you need in front of clients and regulators: how many markings were adjusted before sending and how many went out anyway, what happened after a tool notice, and what share of AI use runs through approved tools. All at firm level, never per employee.

Total detections

12,438

Top apps

  • ChatGPT
  • Gmail
  • Gemini
  • Slack

Example dashboard. Counts and types only, never content.

Compliance officer

A control you can demonstrate

Show clients, partners, and the regulator that a control sits at the moment of input, with figures per period: markings adjusted or sent anyway, a recorded decision per AI tool, and what people did with the notice.

Privacy officer

No view into individuals

The dashboard shows no text and no single people: only aggregate counts, with no per-employee drill-down anywhere. Insight into patterns, not surveillance of people.

CISO and IT

Nothing changes in your stack

No proxy and no new application. The extension runs in Chrome and Edge. Detection runs on-device or on EU infrastructure, all traffic encrypted in transit.

Honest answers

The questions we hear first.

Straight answers to the questions people actually ask before rolling this out.

Does BeeSensible watch everything lawyers type?

No. The extension analyses text in the input fields of supported tools to highlight sensitive data. In on-device mode, that text never leaves the machine. Otherwise it travels to a BeeSensible server inside the EU, is processed in working memory, and is discarded at once. The content is never stored and cannot be read by anyone, not even an administrator.

Does it block AI tools or block sending?

No, BeeSensible blocks nothing. You see a highlight in the text and choose what to do: remove, replace, or mask. The lawyer stays in control, and the firm gets insight into patterns.

Does this make us GDPR compliant?

No tool makes you compliant on its own. BeeSensible helps with GDPR and your duty of confidentiality by covering the moment of input. The firm stays the controller, BeeSensible is the processor, and a processing agreement is signed.

Does detection work on Dutch data too?

Yes. The detection engine handles Dutch and English reliably and recognises data common in legal work, such as names, case numbers, account numbers, and amounts.

How much work is the rollout?

Limited. There is no proxy to configure. The desktop app for on-device detection and document redaction is optional. The extension runs in the browser your firm already uses and can be rolled out centrally through your management console.

Compliance

Built to support the checks you already have to show.

GDPR

Supports your accountability and covers the moment personal data is entered.

Duty of confidentiality and privilege

Helps recognise client names, case numbers, and confidential details before they are shared.

Processing agreement

A processing agreement is signed with every customer. A product DPIA is available on request.

EU processing

Detection runs on the user's own machine, or on ISO 27001 certified EU infrastructure (API in the Netherlands, detection in Germany).

Give staff a signal at the moment that counts

BeeSensible works in the tools your firm already uses. No rollout project, and you see your first detections in minutes.