Client confidentiality extends to AI tools
Using a client name or matter reference in a ChatGPT prompt may breach confidentiality obligations under the Rules of Professional Conduct, regardless of whether the output was useful.
Legal & compliance
Legal: catch privileged data before it reaches AI tools
Keep contracts, parties, and case identifiers out of AI tools and external channels.
Who this is for
- In-house legal counsel drafting and reviewing contracts
- Compliance officers handling regulatory submissions
- Paralegals summarising case files and correspondence
- Contract managers processing counterparty details and deal terms
Lawyers and compliance staff use AI to draft, review, and summarise. Client names, case numbers, and counterparty details end up in prompts. BeeSensible catches them inline, before privileged information leaves the firm.
Where it goes wrong today
The moments your policy cannot reach.
AI-drafted contracts include more data than intended
Pasting a clause into an AI tool to 'improve the language' often includes party names, amounts, and dates. The AI tool now holds that data under its own terms of service.
Regulators are starting to ask about AI tool usage
Bar associations and compliance regulators are issuing guidance on AI tool usage. Demonstrating a technical control layer, not just a policy, is increasingly expected.
Inline guidance, not a blocker
Privileged information is flagged at the moment it enters the AI prompt, not after.
Client names, case identifiers, and counterparty details are caught in the same tool lawyers use to draft. Nothing has to leave the firm's browser for detection to work.
ClaudeHow BeeSensible helps
A browser-level safety net, tuned for this team.
The product covers the surface where the risk actually lives: the compose area of the AI tools and communication apps your people already use.
Legal-specific data detection
Recognises case numbers, client names, counterparty identifiers, confidential markers, and legal document structure patterns.
Works in the drafting tools lawyers already use
Detection runs in the browser. No separate application, no change to the document management workflow.
Confidentiality-aware reporting
Admin reporting shows exposure at tool and category level, without storing or surfacing the privileged content that triggered each detection.
Evidence layer for professional conduct
Detection configuration and handled rates provide a demonstrable technical control for discussions with regulators or professional bodies.
Privileged information deserves more than a reminder not to paste it.
Give legal teams a detection layer that runs where they work, without a separate tool.