Control over AI
Education

Student data does not belong in an AI prompt

Teachers, mentors, and researchers use AI every day. BeeSensible highlights pupil and student data in the text they write, before a prompt or email leaves the school.

  • On-device or EU processing
  • No content stored
  • Helps with GDPR

Who this is for

  • Teachers and mentors using AI for feedback, reports, and parent contact
  • Researchers and staff working with respondent and participant data
  • Data protection officers and privacy officers at schools
  • CISOs and IT teams at school boards, colleges, and universities
Teacher working at a laptop with student records

18

apps with a highlight while you type: AI tools, email, chat, and social

0 sec.

The text you type is processed and discarded at once

Local or EU

Detection runs on-device or on EU infrastructure

A report comment, the write-up of a parent meeting, a mentor note: exactly the texts where AI saves time. And exactly the texts with names, dates of birth, and parents' phone numbers in them. BeeSensible highlights that data while you type, so you can remove it before you send.

From the field

Three moments your policy never reaches.

In the classroom

A report comment in thirty seconds

A teacher has thirty reports to write and a deadline. She pastes her notes into ChatGPT and asks for clean wording. Those notes hold full names, dates of birth, and a remark about a pupil's home situation. The text is ready at once, and the data has left the school.

With the mentor

A parent meeting you ask AI to summarise

A mentor pastes notes from a parent meeting into an AI tool for a clean write-up. The name, date of birth, grades, and the parents' phone number all go into the prompt. The write-up reads better, but the data of a minor has now been processed by an outside tool.

At the board office

The question from the DPO you cannot answer

After an incident, the data protection officer wants to know which student data ended up in which AI tools. A policy on responsible AI use exists. Proof that staff got a warning at the moment itself does not.

01 See and decide

See which AI tools are already used in your school, and decide per tool what is allowed.

The catalog already covers more than 50 AI tools built for education, from exam-proctoring software to homework helpers, each scored on data governance, jurisdiction, and vendor trust. When a teacher opens one, you see it appear. Then the school decides: allow it, allow it with a condition of your own, or not allow it. Anyone opening the tool afterwards sees that decision in the browser, with the approved alternative leading.

50+ education AI tools already risk-scored in our catalog
Search tool, vendor or categoryโ€ฆ
700+ tools
ChatGPT๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
HighAllowed
Claude๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
MediumAllowed
DeepSeek๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณnew
CriticalNot allowed
Perplexity๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธnew
MediumNo decision yet
Mistral๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท
LowNo decision yet
Midjourney๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
MediumNo decision yet
02 Guidance while people write

A student name, date of birth, and BSN are marked before they reach an AI tool.

The teacher sees the sensitive details while writing the report comment. The draft stays useful without sending real pupil data along with it.

Copilot
Draft a short referral summary from these clinical notes.
I can help draft a structured comment. Review all personal details before storing or sharing this document.
Write a report comment for student Inรชs Costa (DOB 22-07-2006, BSN 145823007). Grade for Dutch: 4.5. Parent contact: +31 6 29481023.
Review sensitive details before sharing outside the browser.
03 Clean

Clean a student file before it goes into an AI tool.

A support file, a placement report, a request for extra help: open it in the Mac or Windows desktop app, and names, dates of birth, and BSNs are marked for you to remove before you share the document or paste it into AI.

Student support file.pdf
Student name
Date of birth
BSN
Parent contact details

Why this is hard

The risk sits in the moment someone types.

01

AI is already in the staff room

Staff use ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini for lesson material, feedback, and summaries. Often without calling it AI. Policy lags behind what happens every day.

02

Data about minors gets extra protection

Under GDPR, data about children gets extra protection. Pasting names, BSN numbers, and grades of minors into a consumer AI tool is a breach, even when it happens by accident.

03

A ban backfires

Banning AI outright gives you no safety, only Shadow AI on personal laptops. Staff need help at the moment they type, not a rule they route around.

04

You have to be able to explain it

To parents, to inspectors, to the regulator. Accountability means showing that technical controls work, not just that a policy exists on paper.

Across education

Recognisable wherever you work.

The same risk shows up in different files, from primary school to research.

Primary education

Parent meetings, notes in the pupil tracking system, and reports full of names and dates of birth.

Secondary education

Mentor write-ups, grades, and absence reports about minors.

Vocational colleges

Study coaching, placement assessments, and work-placement files with personal data.

Higher education

Student coaching, grade administration, and theses that carry personal data.

Research

Transcripts, respondent data, and records of study participants.

School administration

Student records, exam administration, and correspondence with parents.

How BeeSensible helps

A warning in the text field, before anything is sent.

Sensitive details get a highlight while staff write. They decide what to remove, replace, or mask.

Recognises education data

Highlights pupil and student names, student numbers, BSN numbers, dates of birth, and parent contact details while you type.

Works in the tools you already use

Runs in the browser, in AI tools, email, and chat, plus a desktop app for macOS and Windows for document redaction and on-device detection. No proxy, no training up front.

You stay in control

You choose: remove, replace with a realistic alternative, or mask. The extension never changes your text on its own and never blocks sending.

Counts, not content

Administrators see patterns by tool and category. What an individual staff member writes is never stored and cannot be read.

For leadership, DPO, and privacy officer

Show the control works, without looking over anyone's shoulder

BeeSensible gives you the figures accountability asks for: how many markings were adjusted before sending and how many went out anyway, what happened after a tool notice, and what share of AI use runs through approved tools. All at organisation level, never per staff member or student.

Total detections

12,438

Top apps

  • ChatGPT
  • Gmail
  • Gemini
  • Slack

Example dashboard. Counts and types only, never content.

Data protection officer

A control you can demonstrate

Show parents, inspectors, and the regulator that a control sits at the moment of input, with figures per period: markings adjusted or sent anyway, a recorded decision per AI tool, and what people did with the notice.

Privacy officer

No view into individuals

The dashboard shows no text and no single people: only aggregate counts, with no per-employee drill-down anywhere. Insight into patterns, not surveillance of people.

CISO and IT

Nothing changes in your stack

No proxy and no new application. The extension runs in Chrome and Edge. Detection runs on-device or on EU infrastructure, all traffic encrypted in transit.

Honest answers

The questions we hear first.

Straight answers to the questions people actually ask before rolling this out.

Does BeeSensible watch everything teachers type?

No. The extension analyses text in the input fields of supported tools to highlight sensitive data. In on-device mode, that text never leaves the machine. Otherwise it travels to a BeeSensible server inside the EU, is processed in working memory, and is discarded at once. The content is never stored and cannot be read by anyone, not even an administrator.

Does it block AI tools or block sending?

No, BeeSensible blocks nothing. You see a highlight in the text and choose what to do: remove, replace, or mask. The teacher stays in control, and the school gets insight into patterns.

Does this make us GDPR compliant?

No tool makes you compliant on its own. BeeSensible helps with GDPR by covering the moment of input and supporting your accountability. The school stays the controller, BeeSensible is the processor, and a processing agreement is signed.

Does detection work on Dutch data too?

Yes. The detection engine handles Dutch and English reliably and recognises data common in education, such as names, student numbers, BSN numbers, and dates of birth.

How much work is the rollout?

Limited. There is no proxy to configure. The desktop app for on-device detection and document redaction is optional. The extension runs in the browser your institution already uses and can be rolled out centrally through your management console.

Compliance

Built to support the checks you already have to show.

GDPR

Supports your accountability and covers the moment personal data is entered.

Data about minors

Helps recognise pupil and student data before it is shared.

Processing agreement

A processing agreement is signed with every customer. A product DPIA is available on request.

EU processing

Detection runs on the user's own machine, or on ISO 27001 certified EU infrastructure (API in the Netherlands, detection in Germany).

Give staff a signal at the moment that counts

BeeSensible works in the tools your school already uses. No rollout project, and you see your first detections in minutes.